I'll start out with a useless comment: I really enjoyed 'Belonging to the Land'. For me, personally, I felt that there were separate entry points throughout the three sections of the story, which kept me interested while changing my focus to different aspects of the narrative.
The opening to the section entitled 'In the Sixth Grade' gave a very good indirect indication of the kind of relationships that were going to be discussed in the rest of the short story: "We had what, I later learned, was a symbiotic relationship. We'd cheat on tests together - he'd open a book so I could read the needed information, and then he copied my response. I provided the answers, he took the risks" (309). The mutually beneficial interaction between the two students reflects the relationship between the farmers and the farmworkers, though the risk factor for the farmworker is much greater. This unequal amount of risk brings Masumoto to the question, "Wasn't nature supposed to be fair and democratic?" (310) The concept of a 'symbiotic' yet unequal relationship is the theme throughout Masumoto's story and is especially relevant when applying the question about nature being "fair and democratic" to America and its treatment of Japanese Americans. In other words, nature is a metaphor for America.
In the section 'White Ashes' Masumoto writes, "Dad explained the advantages of land ownership. "It's American!" he claimed. "You keep all the profits." But I knew him better. He also meant you had a place of your own, a place the family could plant roots" (311). Despite his father's ambitions, the "fair and democratic" way of American life ceased to apply to Japanese Americans after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Though the Masumoto family took great care of the crops they tended, there are still a few times throughout the story where nature destroys the crops. Similarly, though the family also makes an honest living and takes a low percentage of wages from the farmers, America doesn't hesitate to put the Japanese Americans into internment camps.
In a direct response to the epigraph, Nikky Finney asserts through content, sound, and metaphor that "We were more than blue fingers & endless backs" (163). The first line rejects the idea of African American slaves as being less than human by stating that they are more than simple body parts or, as the image "endless backs" implies, animals (163). The directness and brevity of the first line also gives it more impact as a rebuttal to the epigraph, and thus functioned for me, personally, as the first entry point.
On the first page, there are two instances of alliteration that I want to point out: "Our math, mind, and muscle" and "every heart hammered purpose" (163). The alliteration not only calls attention to these objects, but it also creates a sense of relation between the two or three things. In the first quote, the similarity that Finney builds between "math, mind, and muscle" implies that they each play an important role in their strength. Additionally, the line "heart hammered" illustrates the body as a tool; their emotions fuel their bodies, their bodies fuel their actions, and by the end of the poem, though they are being used for their bodies, they are also using their bodies to leave their signature within the landscape. I believe this is all summed up with the line, "Our hands were living blackboards" (164).
The first thing I noticed about 'Working in a Region of Lost Names' was Arroyo's enamor with nature. The narrator speaks often about what he remembers and what he doesn't, and it seemed to be a pattern that he would remember aspects of his environment over aspects of what was actually occurring at the time (i.e. "I don't recall any of those first days of work. What I remember is a morning - gold, everything - the grass, the trees, a long clothesline - speckled with dew") (46). The narrator's formal, romanticized language surrounding the environment reveals to readers his respect for nature and how closely it tied in with his emotions. Despite not remembering the names of the men he worked with, the narrator is still able to remember their faces, and the time that he spent with them he remembers most often as associated, somehow, with the color gold. The reflection of the narrator's respect towards the men he worked with in the way he remembers the environment displays his deep connection with nature in its ever-cycling changes.
I really like the connections you made about the "In the Sixth Grade" section of "Belonging to the Land." I hadn't thought about Matsumoto's relationship with Jessie in that way but it makes complete sense. It seems like a universal truth that in the face of an uncontrollable nature humans need these symbiotic relationships to survive and thrive, yet throughout human history we have spent so much time and energy creating and perpetuating discord, violence, and discrimination.
ReplyDeletei agree with Amanda, Laura, you make some very strong connections among these three pieces and how they talk about the political use of land and the folks who are its workers and its owners. In each piece you go right to the heart of the story and extract the implications of these relationships. In addition you recognize the important uses of language. good o
ReplyDeletee
I too noticed the color gold being repeated in 'Working in a Region of Lost Names'. I found his use of color very interesting. Gold, yellow, blue, green, silver, gray, white, black, red, purple, orange, brown - all appear in the story, and I could probably find more. Where his memories lacked in details of action, like you mentioned, they were very vivid in color. Gold definitely seems to be the one repeated the most. But why? In my response to this story I said that I felt like the author was less aware of the reader, and more focused on his path through his mind. To me, these colors represent a yearning for more details in his memories, a sort of grasping at straws. I am curious what others thought of his use of color because my interpretation is more of just the feeling I got from the words, and I feel like there's more to it.
ReplyDeleteI too loved the line, "Our hands were living blackboards" (164). I felt like it summed up the poem by saying that skill needed to be realized. I like that use of the word "our" because it unified people who were capable. Blackboards paint this image of right and wrong to me and I think that image lends itself well to the narrative in that these men are trying to say that they are capable, that they are just as right as the students and teachers that will be working on that board.
ReplyDelete