In the chapter/vignette, ‘Dear Rufus, Agnes & Co.’,
Alice Walker’s illustration of her close relationship with ‘the girls’ creates
a notion of the human qualities of chickens. This is the first chapter in which
Walker begins writing directly to the chickens (or, at least, writing as if she
were composing a letter to them). However, by simply reading the title, a
reader who wasn’t familiar with the chickens could mistake the names for names
of human companions. The title, then, functions to humanize the chickens and,
specifically with the word ‘dear’, create the expectation for a personal and
possibly intimate vignette.
Walker
contextualizes the piece by writing, “I have taken a plane that has thus far
flown me high over the hills where you (and I) live” (37). The aforementioned
sentence also places particular emphasis on the chickens; Walker chooses to
place herself in parentheses as if she were her own afterthought. Taking into
account that Walker is supposedly writing to her chickens on her flight to
India already shows the reader her devotion to her ‘girls’, but this devotion
is emphasized by the syntactical placement of herself and her chickens.
Walker
continues the thread of placing herself and the chickens on the same level (or
even placing them on a higher level) when she writes, “It was hard to leave
you, and I will be gone for quite some time, in chicken terms, but at least
before I left I was able to conduct the experiment with persimmons I had long
envisioned” (37). Here, Walker discusses time on a scale relative to the
chickens, acknowledging that what may seem like a short time to her may be a
much longer time to her ‘girls’. The recognition of the difference in time
communicates Walker’s empathy and care for the chickens, allowing the reader a
subtle glimpse of the close relationship she has with them. Additionally, by
using the specific word ‘the’ before ‘experiment’, Walker invites the reader
into this personal relationship by alluding to inside information that she has
already given in prior chapters about how she wants to see if the chickens love
persimmons as much as she does. Walker invites the reader in again when she
writes, “Space nuts”, as if she were
sharing an inside joke with the audience.
The
intimacy of the piece is emphasized by Walker’s recounting of the morning that
she brought persimmons to the chickens: “You were interested, as you always
are” (38). The brief and assured mention of the chicken’s habits illustrates
the close relationship between Walker and the chickens. Additionally, she also
pauses before the aforementioned quote to describe the persimmons, which were
“a wonderful and visually satisfying display of colors [she] love[s]: deep
orange, red, and yellow” (38). Despite a more common perception of chicken feed
being unwanted scraps or grain, Walker offers the chickens a chance to share her
love of persimmons, which is illustrated by her passionate description of them.
Through this detailing and the others mentioned above, Walker gives the reader
a notion of the connection and care she has formed with and for the chickens;
she seems to be attending to the reader in the same way that she tends to her ‘girls’
– with careful and loving attention. I speculated that the portion she wrote on
her brothers tricking her about the tartness of persimmons may have to do with
her desire to transform the reader’s notions about chickens; what the reader
may see as common, mindless farm animals, she desires to expose as the devoted
creatures she sees them to be.
love your connection to the brother's tricking her and not being able to take things at face value. You do a good analysis here, recognize how the intimacy makes the humanity of the piece more prevalent. well done
ReplyDeletee
Great response! I completely agree that Walker continually humanizes her chickens and places them at least equal if not higher than her. After all, they are even called angles in both the subtitle and the chapter 21 title.
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job of deconstructing Walker's syntax/form. When reading I noticed her love for her chickens, of course, but didn't really think what was contributing to this observation besides the obvious (such as word choice). I appreciated your observation that, had someone unwittingly flipped to Chapter 9, they might've thought she was talking to humans.
ReplyDeleteI also loved how you pointed out her word choices as being key to the tone of this piece. I also noticed the way she gives human characteristics to the chickens throughout the book, almost forcing the reader to see them as equals.
ReplyDelete