First I’ll start with a personal and not a literary
statement: frankly, after all the trouble it took for me to get a hold of a
copy of Maps to Anywhere, I fully
expected not to like it and went in to reading it with a little bit of
annoyance. But! After the first few vignettes, I found that I was completely
interested in and absorbed by the stories. And fun another side note: I wikipedia'd
Bernard Cooper just for fun, and I found out that he and I share a birthday.
While I enjoyed the whole book, I felt like I connected with
it most in the chapters where Cooper discusses his family. It is during these
most personal parts of the book that I felt his writing really shone, using his
art to create a tribute to his family and the difficulties they went through
and the lingering scars they have left. The chapter “The Wind Did It” reveals
so much of Cooper’s complex relationship with his father. A relationship filled
with distance and a heavy past but also with love. I felt it was very fitting
that the chapter opens with Cooper’s father telling him stories, tall tales,
that Cooper then says are untrue, but are still a way for the two men to
communicate and relate. His father replies, “I was just thinking. I was just
looking back”(49). Such a statement creates a poignant parallel for what Cooper
is doing himself with these memoir chapters. Telling stories ties the two men
together, the idea that storytelling maybe runs in the family.
I felt a key passage in this chapter came when Cooper’s
father invites him on a vacation to visit Machu Pichu. Cooper then thinks, “As
tempting as his offer sounds, as much as it appeals to my desire to be, for the
first time, his loyal son, I’ve never taken a trip alone with my father, and to
attempt one now might jeopardize the intimacy we’ve recently achieved” (52). So
much is revealed in this passage. Cooper’s reluctance winning out against the
“tempting” nature of the offer shows the distance between them. It also shows how
their relationship now is much different than it was previously because of the
conscious effort of two adults to cultivate a relationship rather than the
natural, easy bond between two family members. There is also a sense of fear of
change, maybe of reverting back to a state of noncommunication if Cooper shares
too much of himself too candidly. They are the last ones in their family to be
alive; there is no more buffer of mother or sibling between them, and the loss
of these two family members probably makes the two men want to be able to value
time with each other more. While it is never stated outright, the fact that
Cooper speaks of wanting to be his father’s “loyal” son implies that maybe his
brother was preferred to him—or at least occupied more space in his parents’
mind and emotions—and maybe it had something to do with Cooper’s sexuality.
“The House of the Future” was the other part of the book
that really spoke to me because it was so bittersweet and tragic. I thought it
was so interesting that in the intersection of all of these emotions Cooper had
as a boy growing up: admiration and idolization of his brother, a burgeoning
homosexuality, the grief of living with a terminally ill family member where he
was daily experiencing loss even while Gary was still alive—Cooper identified
his feelings for his brother as bordering on desire. And this chapter seemed to
be an homage to Gary
as well as a way to communicate Cooper’s processing of this time in his life. I
feel all the talk of the amazing convenience in the House of the Future ties in
very well and creates a poignancy with the story of his dying brother. The two
are intimately entwined as Cooper remembers:
“What lit our dim house was the ember
of mother’s cigarette floating back and forth through space as she brooded over
my brother. For a year he had languished, reading in his room, one by one his
white cells snuffed…But even in the dead of night the House of the Future could
simulate day with ‘floor to ceiling columns of light/Trans-ceiling polarized
panels/Mobile lighting to bathe each room in a glow as warm as the sun.’”
(96)
In the House of the Future everything is convenient,
possible, and at the tips of your fingers versus the slow, inevitable breaking
down of Gary ’s
body and the hope in the family for his life. In the House of the Future, in
the world of the future, you get the sense that Gary would not have to succumb to illness and
death at such a young age because science would make everything possible and
curable. The family could stay whole and healthy forever in the perfect
environment that met and anticipated all of their needs in neat and tidy ways.
None of the messiness and complexity of life where the issues of his brother’s
health radiated out into fracturing all parts of the family’s life.
Amanda, I think you're absolutely right when you call the relationship between Cooper and his father really complex. I also like that you pointed out how both men play with the truth - it's a parallelism that I hadn't thought about before. The way I thought about Cooper's reluctance to go to Machu Pichu was this: I hear a lot about children and their parents getting along better when they don't have to live together. Also, I felt that Cooper's initial descriptions of his father weren't that favorable, but became more forgiving as the stories went on. I thought that perhaps he was being protective of the perspective on his father Cooper has gained as an adult.
ReplyDeleteI loved how you used the quote by Coopers father saying he was just telling a story, just looking back. When I read this book I did not make the connection of that to the feeling of disorganization I got while reading many of the vignettes and trying to mentally string them together, thank you for pointing this out!
ReplyDeleteWow, yea, his family dynamics are extremely compact in description, but so very dense in meaning.
ReplyDeleteIn the father son scene I felt like he was trying to show how their relationship was indeed distant. To fear breaking the intimacy of distance they currently share is saying, why try now? Why risk complicating things by confronting differences face to face? It seems like he is trying to share how sometimes it's better to just let a relationship be the way it is, than try to change things after a certain point.
The fact that the father feels as though he needs to impress his son in order to carry out an interesting conversation, also shows the problems they have together. He needs to lie in order to feel like he can say something perhaps? This shows a great level of insecurity between them. Something else to consider…
Great quotes! These would be excellent to discuss further!
Everyone appreciates how much you illustrated in your blog and so do I. It's clear that you tracked the emotional life of the book as well as the literary approach
ReplyDeletee