First off I have to say I absolutely love
this style of non-fiction. I loved reading it, and I really love writing Shorts.
In the introduction, Kitchen and Jones give us some insight on why this
interesting and unique genre is so appealing to writers, “…short give us the
opportunity to discover new voices – or in some cases, to discover the prose
nonfiction voices of writers whose precious work has been in other genres.”
Gibbons writes in “All-Out Effort “ alluding
to things from the very beginning, he prepares. He washes, takes out trash,
sets out clothing, which leaves the reader wondering, why all the mystery? “To prepare myself, I brought back to mind
the useable green of a meadow where we stood at night one time, where we could
see the reassuring lights and sounds of a crowded lit room, and no one could
see us: the moment, ad others like it” (32) Ambiguous sentences such as this,
allow the reader to create their own reasons for the protagonist’s
preparations. I wondered if it was suicide? A marriage proposal? The details
become so central to the readers understanding (if you can even call it that).
Maybe shorts are not about defined understanding of the narrative, but instead, about our own interactions with the text, our own dealings with the vague in contrast with the details, and the themes and tones that might be there, or that we as readers
might be concocting out of desperation.
I think your statement about the short being about the reader's interaction with the text was so interesting. When I first read the story, I thought that maybe it was allowing the moment of relinquishing and new beginnings to exist independently of the circumstances surrounding it, as that is an emotion or feeling that is often overlooked.
ReplyDelete"Ambiguous sentences such as this, allow the reader to create their own reasons for the protagonist’s preparations". I liked this observation, and had a similar thought after reading the introduction and preface. This is an idea that is brought up a lot in my art classes: the viewer, and their interpretation is as vital to the piece as the artists intention. In the context of Art movements this idea didn't exist as a theme or talking point before the movement we are currently experiencing: "Contemporary Art". Though, no doubt it has always been a preoccupation of artists and authors I think it is just now becoming embraced and played with.
ReplyDelete